You are correct in your interpretation of the merger guidelines regarding the transfer of officials from SBCO (Sub-Account Branch of the Post Office) to PA (Postal Assistant) positions. The general principle in such cases is that:
- Transfer in the Interest of Service: If the transfer is in the interest of service, then the transferred officials are typically eligible for TA/TP (Travel Allowance/Transport Allowance). This would cover the expenses associated with their relocation, such as travel and transportation costs, when the transfer is seen as benefiting the service, such as in cases of staffing needs in specific areas or office efficiency.
- Transfer at Own Request: However, when the transfer is at the official’s own request, then the entitlement to TA/TP is usually not provided. In this case, since the transfer is voluntary and not in the interest of service, the individual would generally not be eligible for such allowances.
Conclusion:
- If the transfer from SBCO to PA is at the official’s own request, then TA/TP would typically not be granted.
- If the transfer is in the interest of service, then the official may be entitled to TA/TP, even if it is to their requested location.
You are correct that the merger guidelines do not specifically address the matter of TA/TP entitlements in cases where the official is transferred to a requested location. Therefore, it is generally subject to the interpretation that voluntary transfers do not warrant TA/TP, but those in the interest of service do.