The debate over the 8th Pay Commission is heating up, and at the center of it all is the fitment factor—a crucial multiplier that determines the revised salaries of central government employees. The National Council (JCM) Staff Side, led by Shiv Gopal Mishra, has strongly pushed for a minimum fitment factor of 2.57 or even higher, arguing that anything less would be insufficient to cope with rising living costs.
But if history is anything to go by, the fight for fair wages under the 7th Pay Commission (CPC) shows us that employee unions may have a tough battle ahead.
The 7th Pay Commission Fight: Unions vs. Government
During the implementation of the 7th CPC in 2016, employee unions initially demanded a fitment factor of 3.68, which would have increased the minimum basic salary from ₹7,000 to ₹26,000. Their argument was based on rising inflation, increased family expenses, and a long-overdue salary correction.
However, after intense negotiations and government scrutiny, the final approved fitment factor was 2.57, bringing the minimum basic salary to ₹18,000 instead of the demanded ₹26,000. This left employees feeling shortchanged, as the hike was significantly lower than expectations.
Key Takeaways from the 7th CPC battle:
✅ Unions demanded 3.68, but the government approved only 2.57.
✅ The minimum salary was increased from ₹7,000 to ₹18,000.
✅ The government justified the lower fitment factor to control fiscal strain.
✅ Employees and unions were deeply dissatisfied, with many protests across India.
What’s Different in the 8th Pay Commission?
Fast forward to the 8th Pay Commission, and the same battle seems to be repeating. NC-JCM Secretary Shiv Gopal Mishra has made it clear that a fitment factor of at least 2.57 is the minimum requirement—with some employee groups pushing for a higher multiplier of around 3.00 to 3.50.
Why is a Higher Fitment Factor Needed?
🔹 Rising Inflation: Since the last pay revision, the cost of living has skyrocketed, making it harder for government employees to maintain a decent standard of living.
🔹 Outdated Calculation Models: The current salary structure is still based on the 15th Indian Labour Conference norms, which consider a family size of only three. Unions are now arguing for a more realistic family unit of five to include dependent parents.
🔹 Additional Expenses: Unlike in the past, government employees now face increased technology costs, healthcare expenses, and children’s education fees, which were not factored into previous pay commissions.
Challenges Ahead for Employees
Despite strong demands, government insiders hint that a high fitment factor is unlikely due to fiscal constraints. Former Finance Secretary Subhash Garg has already dismissed the idea of a fitment factor of 2.86 or above, calling it “asking for the moon.”
If history repeats itself, employees might have to settle for a fitment factor close to 2.57 again, even though many believe a higher multiplier is necessary.
If the 7th Pay Commission is any indicator, government employees should brace for a long fight and tough negotiations. While unions continue to push for a higher fitment factor, the final decision will ultimately come down to the government’s fiscal policy and willingness to address real wage concerns.
The question remains: Will the 8th Pay Commission deliver a fair salary revision, or will history repeat itself with another disappointing outcome for employees?
One thing is certain—government employees must stay united and vocal if they want a better deal this time around.